Yet, this access to quality
leads one to question if varying prices among dating services create a
dating elitism that separates the working man from the "professional"?
If so, this elitism is the natural selection of the dating services world;
it is a natural selection predicated on access, which is often predicated on
money. Of course, this is nothing new. Social Darwinism has always favored
someone over another, whether for looks, money, talent, or (heaven help the
average people), all three. Having
been a teacher, I certainly considered myself a professional, but not one
that could necessarily fork out thousands of dollars for a pre-arranged
lunch. Thus, I was eliminated from that dating pool and forced to find
another place to swim. Let's just hope it's not the bottom of the bowl.
Consideration of this
elitism proffers another side too. Free dating web sites will most likely
attract people who do not choose to, or who cannot afford to pay for
exposure. This implies, of course, an unstable economic situation (Get a
job!) or a lack of seriousness about meeting someone for a relationship (No,
I don't want to have IM sex with you!). Thus, those looking for Mr. or Ms.
Right, might infer that it's not worth the "price" paid in lost time
searching for quality.
|
After all, once one's
paycheck predetermines the dating possibilities, isn't it really about
choices, standards, and desire? While two nights of dining out or going for
drinks could not pay for a year membership to some dating services, it could
easily pay for a month of most online subscriptions.
"Match.com was my first
choice five years ago. At that time there were only a few options for online
dating. Because Match.com wouldn't let you do much without paying, I found
they had a higher class of people to choose from than Yahoo personals,"
says one single, thirty-eight year-old woman who has used Match on and off
for five years.
|
So, what does all this talk
of cost add up to? That I can't say. It's only of value to those who
press forward with the optimism of Sex & the City's Charlotte. It's
meaningful to the few who don't give up despite the long walk alone to the
car at the close of a fruitless evening, the unreturned phone call, or the
disappointing kiss.
|